Saturday, May 28, 2022
Real EstateUK

Britain’s most and least affordable places for FTBs revealed

Kensington and Chelsea

Kensington and Chelsea is the least affordable place for first-time buyers, while East Ayrshire in Scotland remains the most affordable, according to Nationwide’s report

First-time buyers face spending at least six times their annual wages to get on the property ladder in nearly half (45%) of Britain’s local authority areas as affordability becomes more stretched.

Back in 2016, just over a third (35%) of local authority areas had average house price-to-earnings ratios of six or more, according to the analysis by Nationwide Building Society.

The London borough of Kensington and Chelsea is the least affordable place for those trying to get on the property ladder, while East Ayrshire in Scotland remains the most affordable, Nationwide’s report found.

First-time buyers face paying nearly 15 times their earnings to buy a home in Kensington and Chelsea, compared with just under two-and-a-half times earnings in East Ayrshire.

The report used official house price and earnings data from 2021.

Andrew Harvey, a senior economist at Nationwide, said: Most authorities in the South West (of England) have seen a deterioration in affordability over the last year, but Cotswold replaced Bath and North East Somerset as the least affordable area, with a house price-earnings ratio of 8.6.

This district includes sought-after towns such as Cirencester, Tetbury and Moreton-in-Marsh, he said.

Swindon remains the most affordable area in the South West, with a house price-to-earnings ratio of 5.4, Harvey said.

He continued: Rutland, the smallest historic county in England, remains the least affordable authority in the East Midlands, while in the West Midlands it is Malvern Hills.

In Yorkshire and the Humber, the district of Ryedale in North Yorkshire continues to have the highest house price-to-earnings ratio, despite seeing weaker price growth over the last year than most of the region. This predominately rural area includes towns such as Malton and Pickering, he said.

Barnsley has replaced North East Lincolnshire as the most affordable area in Yorkshire and the Humber, Harvey said.

Affordability in Craven, which includes the market town of Skipton in Yorkshire, has improved since 2016, with the average first-time buyer house price-to-earnings ratio decreasing from 6.5 to 5.5.

Harvey added: The least affordable area in the North West government region is South Lakeland in Cumbria, which includes parts of the popular Lake District national park, including Ambleside and Windermere.

Copeland remains the most affordable area in the North West of England, despite average prices rising 11% over the past year, he said.

In Wales, Harvey said the Vale of Glamorgan has replaced Cardiff as the least affordable area.

He said: Prices in the Vale, which includes Barry, rose by 17% year-on-year, reflecting a trend in Wales of stronger price growth in areas outside of the major cities.

Merthyr Tydfil remains the most affordable local authority in Wales, Harvey added.

In Scotland, Edinburgh continues to have the highest house price-to-earnings ratio.

East Ayrshire, in Scotland, continues to be the most affordable authority in Great Britain, with average first time buyer house prices just 2.4 times average earnings, Harvey said.

Important:

The articles are for information purposes only and Invest for Property shall not be held responsible for any errors, omissions or inaccuracies within it. Any rules or regulations mentioned within the website are those relevant at the time of publication and may not be the most up-to-date.

Invest for Property does not endorse any of the products or services that appear on it or are linked to it and are not liable for any action that you may take as a result of the content of this website, or losses or damage you may incur doing so.

There is no obligation to purchase anything but, if you decide to do so, you are strongly advised to consult a professional adviser before making any investment decisions.

Please remember that investments of any type may rise or fall and past performance does not guarantee future performance in respect of income or capital growth; you may not get back the amount you invested.

Leave a Reply