Thursday, September 23, 2021
UK

Proposed property development rejected following campaign

Hoover Building’s plans for 22-storey apartment block behind London’s best-known Art Deco landmark has been rejected after a furious campaign

Hoover Building’s plans for a “built to rent” development has been rejected following a furious campaign.

The plan for 250 rental flats generated 521 objections and a 2,685-signature petition.

Campaigners opposed to plans for an apartment block that they claimed would “desecrate” London’s best-known Art Deco landmark are celebrating after the proposal was thrown out.

Ealing council’s planning committee voted by nine to two to reject the application for the 22-storey development immediately behind the Grade II* Hoover Building on the A40 in Perivale.

Developers Amro sought consent for the “built to rent” block of around 250 flats on the site of a petrol station and part of a car park serving a Tesco store.

However, the scheme, known as The Wiltern, generated 521 objections and an online petition was signed by 2,685 people.

Critics included Rick Wakeman, keyboard player for prog rock group Yes, who was born in Perivale and described the proposal as an “eyesore” in a tweet.

The former Hoover factory’s main building opened in 1932 to a design by architects Wallis, Gilbert and Partners.

The building was sold in 1989 to Tesco, which built the supermarket behind it. Speakers at last week’s meeting at Ealing Town Hall included former deputy mayor and Perivale councillor Munir Ahmed.

One opponent, company director Cormac Gilmore said nearly 90 years ago the board of Hoover left us with the legacy of this magnificent building and the board of Tesco are now custodians of it.

Gilmore said, we would urge them to come up with a building that is workable, sustainable and complementary to what is already there. We want them to come back and engage with us. It is a good opportunity for Tesco to show good governance.

Amro said it had altered the project’s design “to avoid overlooking, overshadowing, and avoiding negative impact on the views from neighbouring buildings, in particular, the Hoover Building”.

A Tesco spokesman said they are grateful to the council for their consideration but are of course disappointed with the decision.

An Ealing council spokeswoman said the planning application was refused on the grounds of the impact of height on the Hoover building.

Important:

The articles are for information purposes only and Invest for Property shall not be held responsible for any errors, omissions or inaccuracies within it. Any rules or regulations mentioned within the website are those relevant at the time of publication and may not be the most up-to-date.

Invest for Property does not endorse any of the products or services that appear on it or are linked to it and are not liable for any action that you may take as a result of the content of this website, or losses or damage you may incur doing so.

There is no obligation to purchase anything but, if you decide to do so, you are strongly advised to consult a professional adviser before making any investment decisions.

Please remember that investments of any type may rise or fall and past performance does not guarantee future performance in respect of income or capital growth; you may not get back the amount you invested.

Leave a Reply

four × 5 =