Thursday, August 11, 2022

UK tenants may be hit by new Section 21 rules

The Residential Landlords Association has found that the new law would make landlords and agents “more selective” regarding tenants

According to new research, 84% of landlords and agents revealed that plans to scrap ‘no explanation’ repossessions would make them “more selective” about the tenants they rent to.

The Residential Landlords Association, who conducted the one of the largest ever non-government surveys of landlords and agents, has warned that this means that landlords would be less likely to rent to those considered to be of higher risk of rent arrears or causing damage to a property, such as tenants with pets. Landlords would be concerned that if problems emerged they would not be able to swiftly regain possession.

The research also refutes the argument that many Section 21 notices are used for no reason. Of those landlords who had used this route to repossess properties, 84 per cent had used it because of tenant rent arrears, 56 per cent had used it because of damage to a property and 51 per cent had used it because of anti-social behaviour.

In fact, rather than landlords seeking to evict tenants by this route 26 per cent said that they had served a Section 21 notice at the tenants request to enable them to seek social housing to avoid them being classed as intentionally homeless.

At present, landlords can repossess properties using two routes. One, known as Section 21, enables a landlord to regain possession at the end of a tenancy and requires two months’ notice to be given but without providing a reason. Under the other avenue, known as Section 8, landlord can repossess a property under a number of set grounds including rent arrears and anti-social behaviour.

The problem facing landlords is that the Section 8 process can take a long time during which a problem tenant may not be paying rent or could potentially be causing a nuisance to other tenants or neighbours. Many report dissatisfaction with the courts, citing numerous delays and problems with regaining possession from tenants for anti-social behaviour or rent arrears.

It currently takes an average of over five months from a landlord applying to court for a property to be returned to them.

The Government plans to consult on proposals to scrap Section 21 repossessions in favour of an as of yet undefined system.

Policy Director for the Residential Landlords Association, David Smith said that whilst no landlords should ever abuse the system, it is only right and fair that they can repossess properties swiftly and with certainty in legitimate circumstances.

Smith said that at present, only Section 21 provides this certainty. If the Government is to get rid of it, landlords should have the same level of confidence and certainty about repossessing properties in cases such as rent arrears, anti-social behaviour or wanting to sell the property. Without such confidence landlords will simply leave the market, making it more difficult for the growing number of people looking for a home to rent.

Secure tenancies will mean nothing without the homes to rent being there in the first place.


The articles are for information purposes only and Invest for Property shall not be held responsible for any errors, omissions or inaccuracies within it. Any rules or regulations mentioned within the website are those relevant at the time of publication and may not be the most up-to-date.

Invest for Property does not endorse any of the products or services that appear on it or are linked to it and are not liable for any action that you may take as a result of the content of this website, or losses or damage you may incur doing so.

There is no obligation to purchase anything but, if you decide to do so, you are strongly advised to consult a professional adviser before making any investment decisions.

Please remember that investments of any type may rise or fall and past performance does not guarantee future performance in respect of income or capital growth; you may not get back the amount you invested.

Leave a Reply