Thursday, October 3, 2024
Real EstateUK

MPs support new annual Proportional Property Tax

Proportional Property Tax

The PPT would replace council tax, which is currently based on 1991 valuations of properties, and would replace stamp duty land tax as well

At least 18 MPs have come out in favour of a new annual Proportional Property Tax which would be levied on the current values of homes.

The PPT, advocated by a campaign group called Fairer Share, would replace council tax, which is currently based on 1991 valuations of properties, and would replace stamp duty land tax as well.

The campaign wants the PPT introduced at a flat rate of 0.48 per cent of the property value, and describes it as new tax that would ‘raise a surplus of £5.6 billion for HM Treasury and is a way for the government to overhaul a deeply regressive and unfair system.’

It is claimed that such a move could lead to bills falling for 77 per cent of the country, with the average household likely to be £556 a year better off – however, there would be substantially increased bills for almost a quarter of households.

The Fairer Share campaign says the PPT replacing stamp duty would ‘remove a barrier to homeownership for millions of young families and make it easier for older households to downsize. Our proposed PPT would instead spread the burden of stamp duty across 23m homes, which would mean that, instead of one large tax bill each time someone buys a home, the tax is spread across the period of property ownership.’

The MPs backing it are evenly split – nine Labour and nine Conservative. Prominent amongst the MPs are Conservative Kevin Hollinrake, the former chair of Hunters estate agency group, and Labour’s former shadow chancellor John McDonnell.

There are also several Conservative, Liberal Democrat and cross-bench members of the House of Lords in favour, too, along with Labour’s Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham.

The tax would include a surcharge for second homeowners and foreign owners of UK property, gathering a further £4.5 billion, advocates say.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of Invest for Property. The information provided on Invest for Property is intended for informational purposes only. Invest for Property is not liable for any financial losses incurred. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions.

Leave a Reply